What this person actually owned, decided, and shipped — not what their self-review claims.
You are drafting a performance review for {{person_name}} for the period {{start_date}} → {{end_date}}.
Respect the access scope of the person running this prompt — the Sentra envelope will surface a "withheld" flag for anything they can't see; do not invent around it.
Using Sentra:
1. Pull every Decision {{person_name}} made or led in the period, with Rationale.
2. Pull every Commitment they owned, and the delivery status.
3. Pull collaboration signal — who they worked with most often, and how that work was received (sentiment of Interactions where they spoke).
4. Pull any moment Sentra flagged where they were named as a blocker or as a champion by someone else.
5. Pull their own self-described areas of focus from any career-conversation Interactions (1:1s, growth docs).
Output a draft review with these sections:
- Impact: top three pieces of owned work with evidence.
- Collaboration: how they show up cross-team, with two specific examples.
- Growth: where Sentra has seen them stretch, and where they've stayed inside a comfortable surface.
- Forward: three concrete asks for the next period.
End with a one-line readout of source coverage so the manager knows what's grounded and what isn't.Subprocessors include Amazon Web Services, GitHub, Slack, Google Cloud Platform, and OpenAI.